<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reel Reviews &#8211; Cinephile Series #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/</link>
	<description>Reel Reviews - Films Worth Watching</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri,  3 Feb 2012 10:12:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-40823</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/#comment-40823</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

I never made a separate feed for the Cinephile Series.  YOu can certainly subscribe to Reel Reviews from within iTunes.  If it makes it easier, here is a list of are all the &lt;a href=&quot;http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/category/cinephile-series/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cinephile Series&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>I never made a separate feed for the Cinephile Series.  YOu can certainly subscribe to Reel Reviews from within iTunes.  If it makes it easier, here is a list of are all the <a href="http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/category/cinephile-series/" rel="nofollow">Cinephile Series</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-40791</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 09:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/#comment-40791</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t I subscribe to the cinephile series with iTunes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t I subscribe to the cinephile series with iTunes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>HI Michael:

there&#039;s something enthusiastically calming about listening to your show. I listened to Mulholland Dr. while refurbishing a closet in the house my gf and I are re-doing. (see link)

Mulholland Dr! I watched it for the first (and only) time a couple of weeks ago and when I saw your Cinephile, I immediately wanted to check it out to get your take on it, which was, not surprisingly, excellent.

I generally love your critique of the Lynchian state of mind, when it comes to movie making. On some level, understanding Lynch helps to accept the occasional incomprehensability (is that a word?) of some of his movies. I kind of thought I was over David Lynch. I think it was Wild at Heart that kind of started me thinking &quot;Okay, he&#039;s just being weird to be weird.&quot; 

But MD is a compelling movie. It&#039;s certainly enlightening to consider the fusion of the old and new footage. I had fuzzed in the backwards plot, but your explanation really helped clarify. I love challenging movies, and MD is certainly among the upper echelon. thanks for adding to my appreciation of it.

ps: about the lack of chapters. it&#039;s good to know that that is a Lynch policy. I kind of admire him for it, but it sure isn&#039;t convenient. I *did* in fact watch MD in two sittings and for the second one, had to set the DVD on 8X, go do a couple of dishes, check back, throw in some laundry, and then sit down and hit &quot;play.&quot; ha!

for future reviews: angel heart, brazil, 12 monkeys. Pardon me if you&#039;ve done any of these. I probably haven&#039;t fully grokked the archive.

mick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Michael:</p>
<p>there&#8217;s something enthusiastically calming about listening to your show. I listened to Mulholland Dr. while refurbishing a closet in the house my gf and I are re-doing. (see link)</p>
<p>Mulholland Dr! I watched it for the first (and only) time a couple of weeks ago and when I saw your Cinephile, I immediately wanted to check it out to get your take on it, which was, not surprisingly, excellent.</p>
<p>I generally love your critique of the Lynchian state of mind, when it comes to movie making. On some level, understanding Lynch helps to accept the occasional incomprehensability (is that a word?) of some of his movies. I kind of thought I was over David Lynch. I think it was Wild at Heart that kind of started me thinking &#8220;Okay, he&#8217;s just being weird to be weird.&#8221; </p>
<p>But MD is a compelling movie. It&#8217;s certainly enlightening to consider the fusion of the old and new footage. I had fuzzed in the backwards plot, but your explanation really helped clarify. I love challenging movies, and MD is certainly among the upper echelon. thanks for adding to my appreciation of it.</p>
<p>ps: about the lack of chapters. it&#8217;s good to know that that is a Lynch policy. I kind of admire him for it, but it sure isn&#8217;t convenient. I *did* in fact watch MD in two sittings and for the second one, had to set the DVD on 8X, go do a couple of dishes, check back, throw in some laundry, and then sit down and hit &#8220;play.&#8221; ha!</p>
<p>for future reviews: angel heart, brazil, 12 monkeys. Pardon me if you&#8217;ve done any of these. I probably haven&#8217;t fully grokked the archive.</p>
<p>mick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Brian, I have read a number of articles about Primer and look forward to your thoughts. I also appreciate your taking the time to call in the Cowboy question.  As I said in the podcast, that has always been one of my favorite scenes in Mulholland Drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I have read a number of articles about Primer and look forward to your thoughts. I also appreciate your taking the time to call in the Cowboy question.  As I said in the podcast, that has always been one of my favorite scenes in Mulholland Drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian A.</title>
		<link>http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reelreviewsradio.com/archives/2004/12/09/cinephile-series-mulholland-drive/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s slightly reassuring to hear that there wasn&#039;t a deeper existential meaning to the Cowboy, and I think you pretty much hit the nail on the head. And on the topic of movies that don&#039;t quite clearly lay everything out for you... I just saw a good one today. It&#039;s called Primer, it was huge at Sundance and it&#039;s starting to roll into theatres everywhere. What&#039;s really interesting about it, though, is that it was made for only 7,000 dollars. Anyway, I&#039;m putting my thoughts together on it and I should have a review together in a couple days. I&#039;ll be sure to fire it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s slightly reassuring to hear that there wasn&#8217;t a deeper existential meaning to the Cowboy, and I think you pretty much hit the nail on the head. And on the topic of movies that don&#8217;t quite clearly lay everything out for you&#8230; I just saw a good one today. It&#8217;s called Primer, it was huge at Sundance and it&#8217;s starting to roll into theatres everywhere. What&#8217;s really interesting about it, though, is that it was made for only 7,000 dollars. Anyway, I&#8217;m putting my thoughts together on it and I should have a review together in a couple days. I&#8217;ll be sure to fire it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

